The Universities Are Collapsing. What Happens To "Science" As They Do?
The Ivory Towered Hierophants are the gate keepers of science.
They tell everyone that Newton, Einstein & Hawking are indisputable pillars who have defined science. Without them telling every young scientist that they must agree, or never graduate, what will happen to science?
Compared to Tesla or Kozyrev, those three are lame. Boring. Not at all interesting. They are better examples of conspiracy theories. Maybe they will be used as examples of how not to do science in the future.
But, seriously, if universities all close because of lack of funding/lack of students, how long before people start questioning Modern Materialistic Science? Will new burgeoning scientists all choose to drop Einstein, if there was competing videos about it on the webz? Or will it be a new war, where there are the Einstein-ists vs the Tesla-ites?
What if you never heard the name Einstein?
Without science constantly saying "Einstein was a genius" would you even know about Einstein?
Einstein hasn't actually done anything. E=mc² is not testable. The tests we can do, without blowing ourselves to smithereens, are quite inconclusive. The margin of error is so large, that it could be E=mc³. And, who actually uses this formula. And quantum physicists are actually creating matter with layered light.
So, if you didn't know Einstein, would the video on the life of Einstein even come up on your feed?
But, lets say that there was some 5chan articles that says, "to be a real scientist, you need to choose between Einstein and Tesla". And so, people went to ThemTube and watched both videos… Tesla is really, really interesting. The things he invented, and the rumors of inventions is fascinating. Einstein is boring, unless you are into relativity… Einstein marrying his relative/cousin and wearing women's clothes.
If the new science student wasn't told about Einstein, would they ever find them?
If they weren't told, which would they choose, Theory of Gravity or Electric Universe model?
Lets say we could perform an experiment. We get these new scientists, before they ever heard about the Theory of Gravity, or Newton. And then we got them to watch videos that explained the Theory of Gravity, and the Electric Universe model, which would they choose?
Well, Newton's theory doesn't accurately explain many phenomena that we measure. (neither does Einstein) However, it is more fully formed. It has decades of people building shit off of it.
The Electric Universe model is fairly new, and it explains all kinds of things that Newton's their doesn't. It is internally consistent. It is quite simple and straight forward. However, it does not have the body of work that the Theory of Gravity has.
So, which would a brand new, untainted, scientist choose?
Why haven't you heard of Kozyrev?
Because Ivory Towered Hierophants really HATE what he did. He disproved so much of what scientists consider pat science, AND he made a bunch of experiments that are simple, straight forward, and almost anyone can perform them.
How dare someone make science simple!!! Modern Materialistic Science demands it to be complex. To keep the riff-raff out. "You just don't understand, because you are not smart enough"
Tesla and Kozyrev aren't talked about in science class. Basically, these two, have bodies of work that are truly fascinating. Their lives, stories and inventions are top notch. I could do a whole semester class on either one, and not run out of material.
Our only problem today is that there is so many lies and untruths muddying the waters. It is really difficult to get to the truth behind either one.
Truly, i find two opinions on Nikola Tesla. Either the person believes Tesla was sent to bring advanced technology to Earth, and was blocked by bad forces. Or the person believes Tesla was a fraudster extraordinaire. And, sadly, the truth is different than either story.
The Philadelphia Experiment is truly terrifying if any part of the rumors are correct. And that it is still classified, when science could be advanced by decades with accurate info, is truly sad.
I would like to assume that the new generation of scientists, the post-university scientists will drop Newton, Einstein and Hawking. However, it will probably be another generation before we get any of this worked out.
How long before Einstein is dropped from the curriculum? It isn't even worth talking about Einstein as a cautionary tale. Will Einstein be relegated to the appendixes like Heavyside? (what? You don't know about Heavyside? Well, you know his equations under the name of Maxwell's Equations, and he is truly the reason we have AC electricity across the continent)
Everyone knows quantum physics won… but few even know about quantum physics. Even if they focus on it in university. University still, predominantly teaches Einsteinian physics. How sad is this?
As enrollment continues to drops at universities, how soon will those Ivory Tower Hierophants lose their grips on the narrative?