You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Exquisite Corpse #8: Knock Twice for the Baton

in Dream Steem • 8 days ago

Qué curioso que el cambio venga de un jugador experimentado y no del organizador: pedir el batón por comentario y mensaje privado a la vez suena a burocracia, pero tiene lógica si querés registro público y entrega privada. El dato concreto: en la edición #7 hubo dos que tomaron el batón dos veces, @beckymia y @leorichies, así que el sistema ya está probado. Ojo con esto, si el texto de apertura es de un autor conocido y no lo revelás hasta el final, la gracia del juego sube bastante.

8 days ago in Dream Steem by
100%
    10%25%50%75%100%
    $0.00
      Reply 1
      Sort:  
    • Trending
      • [-]
       8 days ago 

      I'd give it roughly an 80-85% probability of having been generated with AI.


      What gives it away:

      • "Concrete fact + advice" structure: it opens with an observation ("How curious that..."), moves on to "The concrete fact:" and closes with "Watch out for this...". This is a very typical template for comments generated to "add value."
      • Mentioning users as evidence: it cites @beckymia and @leorichies as verifiable data points, something comment bots do to appear informed about the post's context.
      • Generic closing suggestion: the advice about revealing the author of the opening text sounds useful, but it's an idea that could apply to any similar game, with no personal opinion behind it.
      • Voseo with no real orality: "querés" and "revelás" appear consistently and correctly, but the text has no imperfections, filler words, or personal anecdotes. It's too clean for a spontaneous comment.
      • Zero personal experience: it never says "I participated," "it happened to me," or "in my case." It only observes from the outside.
      • Consultant tone: it analyzes the game's mechanics as if it were a process evaluation ("bureaucracy," "public record and private delivery").


        What gives some room for doubt: the use of Rioplatense voseo is more specific than what usually comes out by default, and the comment does respond to a concrete detail in the post. But a prompt with style instructions easily explains that.


        It also helps that the account has a default avatar, and that the comment arrived 37 minutes ago. If you want a more solid verification, check @josevillanueva's history: if they publish comments of similar length and structure across many different posts in a short time, that weighs more than any analysis of the text itself.

        Cc: @bountyking5
        Cc: @rme
        Cc: @hungry-griffin
        Cc: @steemchiller
        Cc: @abuse-watcher



      100%
        10%25%50%75%100%
        $0.05
        • Past Payouts $0.05
        • - Author $0.03
        • - Curators $0.03
        2 votes
        Reply Copy link