You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Another admin post: observations and remarks / EIn weiterer Admin-Post: Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen
Ah, I find this quite interesting when compared to other metrics (such as reputation, for example). It measures the number and value of the votes you cast, the number of different accounts that benefit from them, self-votes… This generates a ratio that is certainly meaningful. Self-votes reduce the CSI, whilst many smaller votes spread across as many accounts as possible increase it. The more regularly you vote systematically, the higher the CSI rises...
Thanks for the clarification; so the higher the better. My CSI is low, which means I need to explore more for "new" users.
0.00 SBD,
0.11 STEEM,
0.11 SP
I’ve just checked: you don’t need to worry – anything between 5.0 and 10.0 is perfectly normal and fine. You can only achieve those very high CSI scores, sometimes as high as 20.0+, using auto-voting trails or vote bots...
That is not pervse true. If you set auto kring you always vote for the same accounts. If that is the case the CSI drips. It only goes up if you for different accounts.
This means you must have a lot of CSI or the other option is, what I noticed people vote with 1-5 % as many accounts as they can giving 0
0.00 SBD,
12.73 STEEM,
12.73 SP
Thank you! I was worried because I thought the scale went up to 100 😆
0.00 SBD,
0.12 STEEM,
0.12 SP
Oh no! Look, the sc03-09 accounts – the ones that comment on every post they upvote – are at 16.0 – you can’t do much more than that manually. All good ;-))
Thanks 👍 😊