You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Season 34: Week 8 Challenge Question 2
Hi! I haven't seen you around here before, so welcome. Thanks for your feedback. Best regards.
Hi! I haven't seen you around here before, so welcome. Thanks for your feedback. Best regards.
Thank you! Steem was the final stop in the DPoS trilogy. I hope to find more professionalism here and a stronger desire to stand out in the long run. In the coming weeks, I’ll figure out where they’re heading, or whether they already believe their old system works for EVERYONE, or just for the STEEM “old-timers,” who I don’t think offer much of an advantage, especially to newcomers like me, or whether they can even recognize the value of independent, forward-thinking creators.
We’ll see whether the DPoS system wants to save itself through innovation, making room for new, futuristic visions, or whether it intends to fossilize around the same old, pointless “reward multiplication” routine that outside communities keep seeing but rarely engage with.
As I always say, it’s only a matter of time. It’s still too early to draw any definitive conclusions, although I’ve obviously already reached a few preliminary ones.
We’re waiting for input from the top, which, as always, will eventually come. Again, it’s only a matter of TIME.
See you next time, and thanks for sharing that bug report. I really appreciate it! @condividisulweb
If you're waiting for a perfect system, you'll have to create your own, or as blocktrades said, buy more tokens to have decision-making power. 😂
Remember that on any platform or program,
it is ALWAYS the USER BASE that makes the difference!
If you mess with the user base, it’s game over for anyone—the spotlight turns on permanently, and, most importantly, once trust is lost, it NEVER comes back. That’s just statistics!
Furthermore, many major competitors are moving in a different direction, abandoning the DPOS (Delegated Proof of Stake) concept.
As of today, the DPOS challenge can be seen on platforms like Steem and Blurt.
The ideal system would be a fusion of the two, or a dramatic acceleration of one over the other.
Much of what I’ve written has actually come to pass—fortunately, some people do read my work, and perhaps various communities pick up a few ideas here and there, leading to the emergence of new spaces.
The bottom line remains the same: they might ignore the user base—as often happens in the early stages—but eventually, they either adapt, fall behind, or collapse entirely.
Besides, if I were to create a "perfect" system, I wouldn't be FREE.
True freedom lies in SHARING—just like an open-source project! 😂Tomorrow, I’m entering a contest and providing some initial input. Even if they pretend not to read it—acting "superior" by refusing to upvote my content—sooner or later, they will have to acknowledge the quality and intellectual honesty. In the end, they might try to ignore you, but valid IDEAS and "thinking outside the box" can NEVER be ignored... See you soon! 😂@condividisulweb
Please give me examples of the impact your work has had and where. Achievements must be cited with sources; otherwise, they sound like boasting. I offer this as constructive criticism. Have a great rest of the day.
Hey Lady, just go to blockchain hive, blurt and read my comments. You can also expand on publish0x. You'll see how much material and feedback you'll find, especially predictive comments. In my experience, after 2 weeks, They were verifying.
Some WITNESSES from the first two platforms know this very well.
There's no point in talking; fortunately, the facts remain on the blockchain. It seems to me that in some cases you've put them together very well. Reread the comments here so that perhaps your memory will come back, because on some of those topics, there are even active articles.
Forget about sources... Reread the comments and see if anything has happened!!! THE USER IS THE HEART, don't forget that.
Good luck in your participation in this contest...
And remember, always express your thoughts without fear of losing a few votes, because in the end, it's all about FREE THOUGHT.
But we've already covered this topic! @condividisulweb
I'm sorry, I'd need three lifetimes to read all your comments; it's humanly impossible.I am a proponent of synthesis If something cannot be summarized in a few words, it's because there's nothing useful in it.
I'm sorry, but this is a "FLASHBACK." We've already addressed this issue on another platform, and I'm surprised to see you always use the same parameters. This might displease me, but given the repetition, I now have a clearer objective.
So, I'll say "goodbye" by inviting you to simplify your work, and therefore changing the invitation, this time inviting you to reread YOUR comments section on the other platform. Maybe you don't remember which one? You'll find the much-discussed material there. If you want to summarize even further, go to the YouTube channel and search for the two specific videos on this world. Only then can you dispute what's stated in those videos. But disputing it will be really hard, because they're so poorly summarized, but at the same time, they tell truths that NO ONE can dispute because over the years, blockchain has continued to save them, and they're still evident today.
Please try to use FREE THINKING and leave aside "conspiracy theories," because when you approach a topic, you need to know it, and if you delve into it by exposing your own point of view, you must accept that anyone can either challenge its veracity or confirm it, but this can only be done by DEEPLY researching the topic firsthand.
Good luck, Lady, and please don't be the kind of person who writes nonsense out of boredom, spreading INACCURATE concepts.
Forget about blah blah blah, FACTS remain FACTS, especially if technical data is INCONTESTABLE. To date, I have found NO ONE who can dispute REAL FACTS based on the exposure of DIVERSIFIED EXPERIENCES of users, which BLOCKCHAIN PRESERVES despite the "OBSCURANTISM." Also, reread what you wrote because in some cases it might seem very ambiguous. In fact, there are methodologies that are only found in the specific comments, because you need to read ALL the possible dynamics discussed.
This means that it is NOT CORRECT to express an absolutist concept, implying that if an argument cannot be summarized then it is not useful.
You contradict the meaning of LITERATURE and the intrinsic concepts of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.
But I don't want to continue because you are trying to pretend not to understand the true meaning just out of boredom, which is far different from the concept of UTILITY, TRUTH, etc.
Have a good day, LADY, and remember that we are not ALL a bunch of RUNAWAYS. FORTUNATELY, there are still some who use proper language and FREE THINKING. @condividisulweb
I think you sincerely believe what you're saying, but that doesn't mean you're right. Perhaps it's time to start therapy, because writing like this isn't helping you at all. I'm sorry if I made you nervous, but I stand by what I think. Best regards!