You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Season 34: Week 8 Challenge Question 2
I'm sorry, I'd need three lifetimes to read all your comments; it's humanly impossible.I am a proponent of synthesis If something cannot be summarized in a few words, it's because there's nothing useful in it.
I'm sorry, but this is a "FLASHBACK." We've already addressed this issue on another platform, and I'm surprised to see you always use the same parameters. This might displease me, but given the repetition, I now have a clearer objective.
So, I'll say "goodbye" by inviting you to simplify your work, and therefore changing the invitation, this time inviting you to reread YOUR comments section on the other platform. Maybe you don't remember which one? You'll find the much-discussed material there. If you want to summarize even further, go to the YouTube channel and search for the two specific videos on this world. Only then can you dispute what's stated in those videos. But disputing it will be really hard, because they're so poorly summarized, but at the same time, they tell truths that NO ONE can dispute because over the years, blockchain has continued to save them, and they're still evident today.
Please try to use FREE THINKING and leave aside "conspiracy theories," because when you approach a topic, you need to know it, and if you delve into it by exposing your own point of view, you must accept that anyone can either challenge its veracity or confirm it, but this can only be done by DEEPLY researching the topic firsthand.
Good luck, Lady, and please don't be the kind of person who writes nonsense out of boredom, spreading INACCURATE concepts.
Forget about blah blah blah, FACTS remain FACTS, especially if technical data is INCONTESTABLE. To date, I have found NO ONE who can dispute REAL FACTS based on the exposure of DIVERSIFIED EXPERIENCES of users, which BLOCKCHAIN PRESERVES despite the "OBSCURANTISM." Also, reread what you wrote because in some cases it might seem very ambiguous. In fact, there are methodologies that are only found in the specific comments, because you need to read ALL the possible dynamics discussed.
This means that it is NOT CORRECT to express an absolutist concept, implying that if an argument cannot be summarized then it is not useful.
You contradict the meaning of LITERATURE and the intrinsic concepts of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.
But I don't want to continue because you are trying to pretend not to understand the true meaning just out of boredom, which is far different from the concept of UTILITY, TRUTH, etc.
Have a good day, LADY, and remember that we are not ALL a bunch of RUNAWAYS. FORTUNATELY, there are still some who use proper language and FREE THINKING. @condividisulweb
I think you sincerely believe what you're saying, but that doesn't mean you're right. Perhaps it's time to start therapy, because writing like this isn't helping you at all. I'm sorry if I made you nervous, but I stand by what I think. Best regards!
What you write makes me smile. These same words are still used today by little Mark on Hive and all his multi-accounts, who still decide the fate of users and who earns on that platform. This same attitude caused the end of that platform, which believed itself untouchable, at least until it found something to stop them and, by force of circumstance, destroyed them. That something is called KARMA.
Don't worry, even if you write like them, I hope you're not like them, because remember, people aren't stupid, especially if what they write stays on the blockchain and can't be deleted (at least in theory). I hope that from now on, you'll be more honest with yourself, and instead of using these comments to try to "attack" by repeating the exact same methods as the third platform, perhaps you'll find a way to accept that your boredom or laziness in research can't be erased by telling others to seek therapy by attributing some pathology to them. =_=
What you're doing is quite serious, and it certainly makes you intellectually "fragile," because if one user attacks another in this way, there's a whole other story behind it. I won't be the one to tell you what it is because I'm not a professional in this field, but what you wrote is definitely not normal.
Similar words were written by "little Mark" on Hive, who showed his true nature with other users as well. On the web, you should be as gentle with people as you are in real life, because everyone has their own "inner self," and I believe readers aren't that stupid. Unless you're dealing with SEWER RATs, then that would change the conversation.
Let's hope that here on STEEM, from above, they're watching out for multi-accounts and scammers. I wouldn't want to see what's already been seen in HIVE; it would be truly PATHETIC, as well as shameful.
But that's what we're here for! So for now, I send you a virtual hug, hoping you'll be gentle enough with users in general in the future. I'm used to it because I do research and try things out firsthand, testing them where possible trying to improve them with suggestions, as happens with every platform/project I'm present in, even implementing examples, initiatives, etc. But you already know this because you've seen me at work several times, and this seems even stranger to me.
Obviously, it's a good thing for you to have this position.
As I told you before, I'm used to it, but I always don't allow anyone to cross a certain line, because then I always behave according to the person in front of me.
I love consistent people who then demonstrate their value IN THE FIELD.
Here too, as always, I'll take it easy. In the meantime, remember to refine your communication because, as I've always told you, people are not all the same, nor do they all have the same sensibilities, much less the same experiences. The latter (experiences), as demonstrated to date, always make the difference in ANY PROJECT, WHATEVER NATURE.
The main asset, especially in this type of project, is the USERS, and the higher their INTELLECTUAL level, the greater the evolution of the PLATFORM/PROJECT itself.
I won't bother remembering whether you thought this way or not; it doesn't matter to anyone, but that doesn't mean FREE IDEAS don't need any "THERAPY," especially if supported by facts.
Lying to oneself might be a strategy for some, but believe me when I tell you that over time, people recognize those who lie from those who are consistent.
A virtual hug, and I hope to see you again in my or your comments, no matter what platform we're on, because I hope we're smart enough not to be two-year-olds who avoid each other.
I've encountered too many of these. Let's hope you're not one of those, I'd be sorry because as you well remember I communicate with EVERYONE, even with the SEWER RATS who on other platforms used the now documented and famous technique of DOWNVOTE BOMBING which damages the ENTIRE PROJECT, in fact it doesn't affect the creator in question, but also the commenter and even the curators. NO ONE EVER says this because it's better to "hide" it and anyone who holds a At least to DPOS systems, then he shouldn't look the other way.
On the contrary, he should always keep this in mind and should prevent these acts. To date, and for now, I don't see acts of this nature on STEEM. Is this a coincidence? Has something changed? I don't know, but the fact remains that it's still there on HIVE.
This DAMAGES ALL similar DPOS SYSTEMS, so it also includes indirect damage to this platform that uses DPOS.
This is called FREE INFORMATION, which prevents certain individuals from operating in an ILLEGAL and AUTOMATED manner against other users, damaging their accounts and intellectual works of any nature, whether artistic, etc., damaging their reputation just for fun.
But it would be pointless to re-list the legal details involved in these activities, especially when there's paid registration and a contract stipulating terms and conditions and obligations on the part of the service provider, without delving into the tax implications depending on the country in which these services are sold, dear LADY.
For this and other reasons, I believe others are getting irritated and using complacent users to destroy and create chaos.
We hope that here on STEEM, at the first visible signs, they block these types of CHARACTERS by cleaning up and keeping the environment CLEAN and SEWER RAT-proof.
I hope you agree with me on this at least.
Perhaps here on STEEM you'll be encouraged to create more initiatives, because when the environment is CLEAN, everyone is willing to give their best. I hope to see some of your initiatives that will astonish me and make me think, "Wow, I want to participate here!"
I can't wait, hello little lady :D @condividisulweb