Hi Dear @dove11

I liked the systems you selected. I definitely agree with you. But personally, what I feel is that always being considered fully responsible just because of SP and reputation doesn’t seem very right to me. The most important thing here is experience. Experience in performing responsibilities correctly is the most important

• A curator should be someone whose own posts are of good quality. There are many selected people with a lot of fame whose post quality is actually weak. If they cannot cover up their own weaknesses, how can they be considered a curator?

• Also, another thing is that those who have good experience with responsibility and have carried it out correctly without breaking the rules for whatever period they have held it, and have followed the rules properly – these are the people who can handle all these responsibilities well

• Honorable SC02 mentioned whether there is a power down within 30 to 90 days. If this matter can be analyzed, to my knowledge, there are many users like this in the selection you made. Personally, if I were to say, I’d say finding such a person is a bit difficult for the present time

Above all, one thing is clear: the platform’s team management is extremely good and holds important positions. They are much more experienced when it comes to selection. Only they can properly analyze who can be given this responsibility. They always have no one above them. I will definitely wait for those responsible on the platform who play an important role in this selection.