I’m sorry you misunderstood my comment; what I meant was that perhaps your offline experience allowed you to grow here and sustain your membership in a club—an experience most of us here don't share.

On the other hand, what you’ve achieved in four years, I haven’t come close to reaching in eight. But obviously, the question isn't "Why did you rise so high while I didn't?" but rather, "Do you think someone without your financial cushion can afford to stay in a club long enough to qualify for a curation team?"

I should mention that whenever I’ve worked on a curation team, I try to nominate talented people who don't receive much financial support.

From my perspective, you are very talented, but you have received financial support. That is why I have NEVER nominated you. I don't mean to imply that the support you receive is the result of taking "shortcuts," nor do I think it's just luck. You simply know how to get things done.

Also, I’ve read that your proposal isn't new—it’s actually an "old" idea. The question I ask myself is: What didn't work before, and what will be done differently now to make the project succeed?

I apologize if my previous message was open to misinterpretation. I was without power, my UPS battery was running out, and I just wrote everything in a rush.

I’m not a troublemaker. I detest injustice and always try to put myself in others' shoes. Best regards.